<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: City Region report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wmno.wordpress.com/2006/12/06/city-region-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wmno.wordpress.com/2006/12/06/city-region-report/</link>
	<description>Regional government: unelected, undemocratic, unaccountable and unwanted</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: West Midlands NO! Campaign &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Shutters Come Down</title>
		<link>http://wmno.wordpress.com/2006/12/06/city-region-report/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>West Midlands NO! Campaign &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Shutters Come Down</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmno.wordpress.com/2006/12/06/city-region-report/#comment-716</guid>
		<description>[...] The City Region Growth and Prosperity Plan (the new name for the city region proposal) is apparently in draft form and won’t be published until after Christmas.  The city region is, of course, due to be brought into being early next year.  Will the plan be released in time for any objections to be lodged?  Doubtful.  And if the plan is still in draft form, why was it put before the cabinet - a fact that was deleted from the cabinet report we uploaded yesterday?  And how did the cabinet approve the city region project if the proposals for it are still in draft form months later? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The City Region Growth and Prosperity Plan (the new name for the city region proposal) is apparently in draft form and won’t be published until after Christmas.  The city region is, of course, due to be brought into being early next year.  Will the plan be released in time for any objections to be lodged?  Doubtful.  And if the plan is still in draft form, why was it put before the cabinet &#8211; a fact that was deleted from the cabinet report we uploaded yesterday?  And how did the cabinet approve the city region project if the proposals for it are still in draft form months later? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Shutters Come Down &#171; West Midlands NO!</title>
		<link>http://wmno.wordpress.com/2006/12/06/city-region-report/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>The Shutters Come Down &#171; West Midlands NO!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmno.wordpress.com/2006/12/06/city-region-report/#comment-291</guid>
		<description>[...] City Region reportMore city region lies from TelfordBirmingham PostCouncil Leader comments on City Region nameBlair supporting regional governmentIn place of DemocracyAnti-Regions PetitionShropshire Star: Dragged into the pointless city regionHas Brown ordered a stop to the City Region?Regional Assembly Influence? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] City Region reportMore city region lies from TelfordBirmingham PostCouncil Leader comments on City Region nameBlair supporting regional governmentIn place of DemocracyAnti-Regions PetitionShropshire Star: Dragged into the pointless city regionHas Brown ordered a stop to the City Region?Regional Assembly Influence? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
